Readify

Mathematical abstraction and moral detachment

All the Light We Cannot See

Mathematical abstraction and moral detachment take shape in Werner Pfennig’s training as a tension between exact reasoning and the human purpose that reasoning serves. He learns to locate an unknown point from known ones, first at Dr. Hauptmann’s desk and then through a field test with radio transceivers. The calculations are genuinely impressive, but the repeated insistence that they are “only numbers” encourages Werner to treat the work as separable from its ends. The novel makes that separation visible without allowing the mathematics itself to become an excuse: the practical operation of the equipment eventually gives the triangles a destination and a military use.

The Triangle as a Method

Dr. Hauptmann tests Werner by asking whether he understands how two known points can be used to find the location of a third, unknown point. Werner answers cautiously that he believes he does. At the professor’s invitation, he takes the desk chair, though his boots do not reach the floor, and works through trigonometric relations, including the tangent identity and the formula for the sine of a sum. These are not decorative school exercises: they provide the steps by which the distance variable can be brought into the equation and a position calculated.

Dr. Hauptmann supplies the known values and asks whether Werner can draw the triangle. Werner imagines observers measuring the distance between themselves and sighting a distant landmark, perhaps a sailing ship or a smokestack. When he asks for a slide rule, the professor has one ready, as if he anticipated the request. Werner calculates the sines, gives the result as 16.43, draws the triangle, labels its segments, and returns the paper. The sequence establishes both his ability and the disciplined material practice behind it: equation, instrument, calculation, diagram, answer.

From Pure Mathematics to Location

The meaning of the exercise changes when the abstract geometry is applied to the transceivers. During a later test, Werner puts on a headset, adjusts the radio controls, and tunes two receivers to the signal from Frank Volkheimer’s transmitter. Dr. Hauptmann tells him to work directly on the equipment rather than rely on paper, supplying a grease pencil for the metal casing. Werner writes the equation there, uses a slide rule, and produces a vector and a distance of two and a half kilometers. He then uses a protractor and compass to draw the lines on a map.

The test makes the mathematical operation concrete: signals and measured relations can be converted into a location in the landscape. Werner folds the map into his coat and carries the transceivers as the group crosses snowy ground, ravines, and successive climbs. He checks his bearings with a compass and asks whether he should set the equipment out again. When the signal and the search bring them to Frank Volkheimer, Dr. Hauptmann identifies this as what the triangles are for. The earlier question about the purpose of the transceiver has thus acquired an answer through action: the calculations help locate a person by tracking a radio signal.

The Language of Detachment

Dr. Hauptmann’s maxim, “It’s only numbers, cadet,” is presented as a lesson in how Werner should think, not merely as a description of arithmetic. The professor urges him to become accustomed to that mode of thought. Its force lies in what it brackets: the calculation is isolated from the person being located and from the reason the equipment is being used. Werner himself wonders why they are always drawing triangles, what the transceiver is for, and which unknown point Dr. Hauptmann needs to find. His questions register a gap between technical competence and knowledge of purpose.

That gap is not a failure of Werner’s mathematics. He follows the procedure accurately, adapts it to the field by writing on the transceiver casing, and translates the result onto a map. Rather, the detachment is produced by the framing of the task: an operation involving a person can be taught as a neutral problem of points, distance, and signals. The novel’s emphasis on the equipment and the computation makes the abstraction useful while also showing how it can conceal the human stakes of its use.

Success, Unease, and the Human Counterpoint

Werner’s response to the exercise is divided. During the desk test, he feels a sudden, foreboding dread, which subsides when Dr. Hauptmann looks back at him. In the field, by contrast, the successful result leaves him exhilarated; the memory of walking back through the frozen trees with Frank Volkheimer seems almost holy to him. Technical achievement brings pleasure and a sense of transformation, even though the work’s purpose has not become ethically clearer merely because the calculation has succeeded.

Frank Volkheimer complicates the division between instrument and person. To the other boys he appears to be a brute defined by strength, yet, when Dr. Hauptmann is away, he sometimes brings a Grundig tube radio into the office and fills the laboratory with classical music, leaning back to listen. After the field test, he quietly repeats Dr. Hauptmann’s formula about numbers, and Werner echoes the professor’s instruction in the same clipped manner. Frank Volkheimer laughs; for a moment, the threatening figure appears more like the child Werner has seen when he listens to music. The scene does not undo the military function of the tracking work. It places that function beside signs of inwardness that the language of pure mathematics leaves out, exposing the moral cost of treating a person as no more than a point to be found.

Related StoryFlow